Current:Home > reviewsSafeX Pro:Publishers Clearing House to pay $18.5 million settlement for deceptive sweepstakes practices -WealthRoots Academy
SafeX Pro:Publishers Clearing House to pay $18.5 million settlement for deceptive sweepstakes practices
Poinbank View
Date:2025-04-08 16:50:07
Publishers Clearing House agreed to pay out $18.5 million for "deceptive and SafeX Prounfair" sweepstakes practices and change several of its business tactics, the Federal Trade Commission said in a news release on Tuesday.
A proposed court order filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York stipulates that the publishing company needs to make substantial changes to how it conducts its sweepstake drawings and entries online. Mostly older and lower-income consumers are lured to the Publishers Clearing House sweepstakes by catchy language on the company's website such as: "WIN IT!," or "Win for Life!," an FTC complaint said.
Some are lucky: one Pennsylvania-based woman won a $1 million dollar sweepstake prize. Others hope to win money in the sweepstakes and keep purchasing products or paying fees to increase their limited chances, court documents said.
After hopeful customers click on sweepstakes registration links emailed to them by the company, they are directed to several web pages of advertisements for products, including magazine subscriptions, the complaint said. These pages say messages like "$1,000 per week for life AT STAKE!" and "JUST ONE ORDER IS ALL IT TAKES," the news release said.
Consumers interested in entering sweepstakes contests are led to believe "they must order products before they can enter a sweepstake" or that "ordering products increases their odds of winning a sweepstake," the complaint said. One California based-woman thought she won a $5,000 prize, but the company blamed a "technical malfunction" and said that under "official rules" she didn't win and they weren't responsible.
"Today's action builds on previous efforts to crack down on companies that use illegal dark patterns to fuel digital deception and harm consumers," FTC Chair Lina Khan and commissioners said in a statement.
Once consumers enter their email addresses they continue to receive alerts from the company saying that they must take another step to be eligible for sweepstakes prizes, the complaint said. In addition to these misleading practices, Publishers Clearing House hid shipping and handling costs from consumers until there was a financial obligation. While the company also maintained they didn't sell or rent consumer data, the FTC alleges they did as such until around January 2019, when Publishers Clearing House learned they were being investigated, according to court documents.
"While we disagree with the FTC's assertions and have admitted no wrongdoing, we agreed to settle this matter in order to avoid the ongoing expense and distraction of litigation," Christopher Irving, the company's Vice President for Consumer and Legal Affairs, said in a statement.
"The integrity of our sweepstakes prizes and awards was never questioned. We worked hard to address any issues the FTC raised," Publishers Clearing House said.
The $18.5 million dollar fund will be used to refund consumers and implement promised changes to Publishers Clearing House's business practices. These changes include making clear disclosures on their sweepstake entry web pages, stopping surprise fees and shipping charges and stopping deceptive emails, court documents said.
- In:
- Federal Trade Commission
Cara Tabachnick is a news editor for CBSNews.com. Contact her at [email protected]
veryGood! (6425)
Related
- The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
- Trump plans Iowa State Fair stop, though he won’t attend candidate chat with GOP Gov. Kim Reynolds
- Octavia Spencer Says Her Heart Is Broken for Sandra Bullock After Soulmate Bryan Randall's Death
- Mega Millions jackpot grows to $1.58 billion before drawing
- Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
- Zendaya's Hairstylist Kim Kimble Wants You to Follow These Easy AF Beauty Rules
- Here's when you should — and shouldn't — use autopay for your bills
- All of You Will Love These Photos of John Legend and Chrissy Teigen's First Vacation as a Family of 6
- Costco membership growth 'robust,' even amid fee increase: What to know about earnings release
- Italian mob suspect on the run for 11 years captured after being spotted celebrating soccer team's win
Ranking
- The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
- Taylor Swift leads VMA nominations, could make history as most awarded artist in MTV history
- Wayne Brady reveals he is pansexual
- The Book Report: Washington Post critic Ron Charles (August 6)
- DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
- July was the globe's hottest month on record, and the 11th warmest July on record in US
- Sandra Bullock Shared Rare Insight Into Her Relationship With Bryan Randall Over a Year Before His Death
- Federal report sheds new light on Alaska helicopter crash that killed 3 scientists, pilot
Recommendation
Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
Murder charge against Texas babysitter convicted of toddler's choking death dismissed 20 years later
New York governor recalibrates on crime, with control of the House at stake
Mega Millions is up to $1.55B. No one is winning, so why do we keep playing the lottery?
FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
West Virginia approves more pay for corrections workers as lawsuit is filed over conditions
Let Us Steal You For a Second to See Nick Viall's Rosy Reaction to Natalie Joy's Pregnancy
Musk said he'll pay legal costs for employees treated unfairly over Twitter